| |
Halligan Out as VA District Prosecutor 01/21 06:25
WASHINGTON (AP) -- Lindsey Halligan, who, as a hastily appointed Justice
Department prosecutor, pursued indictments against a pair of President Donald
Trump's adversaries, is leaving her position as her months-long tenure has now
concluded, Attorney General Pam Bondi said Tuesday night.
Halligan's departure from the role of interim United States attorney for the
Eastern District of Virginia came as multiple judges were casting doubt on her
ability to remain in the job legally following a court ruling two months ago
that declared her appointment illegal. She was appointed in September to a
120-day stint, which concluded Tuesday.
"The circumstances that led to this outcome are deeply misguided," Bondi
said in a social media post on X announcing Halligan's exit. "We are living in
a time when a democratically elected President's ability to staff key law
enforcement positions faces serious obstacles. The Department of Justice will
continue to seek review of decisions like this that hinder our ability to keep
the American people safe."
The move brings an end to a brief but tumultuous tenure. Trump tapped
Halligan, a White House aide who had served as his personal lawyer but had no
prior experience as a federal prosecutor, to lead one of the Justice
Department's most important and prestigious offices. She quickly succeeded in
securing indictments at Trump's urging against former FBI Director James Comey
and New York Attorney General Letitia James. But a judge later concluded that
her appointment was unlawful and that the two indictments must therefore be
dismissed.
The Trump administration had kept Halligan in place despite that ruling, but
on Tuesday, two judges made clear that they believed it was time for her tenure
to end. Hours later, Halligan became the latest Trump ally to give up her title
amid scrutiny from judges about the administration's maneuvering to install the
president's loyalists in key posts. Last month, for instance, another of
Trump's former personal attorneys, Alina Habba, resigned after an appeals court
said she, too, had been serving in her position unlawfully.
It was not immediately clear who would now lead the U.S. attorney's office
in the Eastern District of Virginia, which has been buffeted by resignations
and leadership turnover since last September when the Trump administration
effectively forced out the veteran prosecutor who had been leading the office,
Erik Siebert, and replaced him with Halligan.
Halligan's departure followed orders Tuesday from separate judges that
marked a dramatic new front in an ongoing clash between the Trump
administration and the federal court over the legitimacy of her appointment.
In one order, M. Hannah Lauck, the chief judge of the Eastern District of
Virginia and a nominee of President Barack Obama, directed a clerk to publish a
vacancy announcement on the court's website and said she was "soliciting
expressions of interest in serving in that position."
In a separate order, U.S. District Judge David Novak said he was striking
the words "United States Attorney" from the signature block of an indictment in
a case that was before him as well as barring Halligan from continuing to
present herself with that title. He said he would initiate disciplinary
proceedings against Halligan if she violated his order and persisted in
identifying herself in court filings as a U.S. attorney, and said other
signatories could be subject to discipline as well.
"No matter all of her machinations, Ms. Halligan has no legal basis to
represent to this Court that she holds the position. And any such
representation going forward can only be described as a false statement made in
direct defiance of valid court orders," Novak wrote. "In short, this charade of
Ms. Halligan masquerading as the United States Attorney for this District in
direct defiance of binding court orders must come to an end."
Novak, who was appointed to the bench by Trump during the Republican
president's first term in office, chided Justice Department leadership for what
he suggested was an improperly antagonistic defense of Halligan by Bondi and
Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche in an earlier court filing.
"Ms. Halligan's response, in which she was joined by both the Attorney
General and the Deputy Attorney General, contains a level of vitriol more
appropriate for a cable news talk show and falls far beneath the level of
advocacy expected from litigants in this Court, particularly the Department of
Justice," Novak wrote.
"The Court will not engage in a similar tit-for-tat and will instead analyze
the few points that Ms. Halligan offers to justify her continued identification
of her position as United States Attorney before the Court," he added.
Halligan was thrust into the position amid pressure by Trump to charge Comey
and James, two of his longtime perceived adversaries. Trump made his desire for
indictments clear in a Truth Social post in which he implored Bondi to act
swiftly.
Halligan secured the indictments, but the win was short-lived. In November,
U.S. District Judge Cameron McGowan Currie ruled that Halligan had been
illegally appointed and dismissed both cases. The Justice Department has
appealed that ruling.
In her own statement, Halligan acknowledged that her 120-day tenure had come
to an end on Tuesday. She also lamented the legal limbo she said she had been
left in by Currie's opinion, noting that judges in the district over the last
two months had "repeatedly treated my appointment as disqualifying" without
actually removing her from the role.
"The court's remedy did not match its rhetoric. It treated me as though I
had been removed from office -- declaring my appointment unlawful and striking
my name from filings -- while never taking the single step Judge Currie
identified as the consequence of that conclusion: appointing a replacement U.S.
attorney," she said.
|
|